Ohio Removes "Pit Bull" From Vicious Dog Definition

Score another victory for the Pit Bull!

Just a day after the “vicious dog” ordinance heated up the Toledo Ohio City Council, Ohio House Assistant Minority Rep. Matthew A. Szollosi and the Ohio House are attempting to alter similar state legislation. If passed, House Bill 14 will remove Pit Bulls from the definition of “vicious dog” from a 1987 law.

Citing the American Kennel Club, Rep. Szollosi stated that breed specific legislation isn’t a viable solution to dog attacks and irresponsible ownership. Instead, he wants the law to maintain strong guidelines for dangerous dogs and educate the public about pet ownership.

“I support the passage of House Bill 14 because it helps insure that animals are not being captured, impounded, and terminated simply because of their breed,” said Rep. Szollosi in a released statement. “It is unjust to punish owners by taking away their pets, even if they have raised a well behaved, family friendly dog.”

To clarify, dogs of all breeds will still be considered vicious if they kill or cause injury under House Bill 14. Other changes noted in the bill include definitions for “nuisance dogs” and “dangerous dogs,” as well as new rules for owners with an animal that has been deemed a “vicious dog.”

Story by Elaine Furst for Dog Files

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Aco
Aco
12 years ago

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS One state down……..many to go.

Cobbie
Cobbie
12 years ago

its about time….

Daveyrockett
Daveyrockett
12 years ago

The Denver city council needs to read this.

Westiechick2
Westiechick2
12 years ago

amen  i love dogs including pittbulls

Resqdogs
Resqdogs
12 years ago

Ontario, Canada needs to follow suit as well.  Here’s hoping!

Anonymous
Anonymous
12 years ago

I just might move to Ohio. 🙂  This is great!!!

Vmckinlay
Vmckinlay
12 years ago

I’m glad that everyone is so excited about something the story says hasn’t actually happened yet.  It isn’t surprising, since the headline is misleading (and just plain untrue), and the story is so garbled.  The way it is written, we can only assume that Toledo removed the pibble designation from its own laws; it is never explicitly stated.  We can assume, since the story goes on to say that there’s now an attempt, via House Bill 14, for the state of Ohio to follow in Toledo’s footsteps.  As in: an attempt – not even close to a done deal. English composition, grade 4:  fail.

Sugar_babies05
Sugar_babies05
12 years ago

heres hoping that one day the state of michigan sees this and says ” we to shall do this bill.” 

Danielle_princess2012
Danielle_princess2012
11 years ago

i have two pitts and i dont care what anyone says or thinks, my dogs wouldnt bite a fly.its all on how u raise them.and thats a well known fact in my book

SUBSCRIBE TO
DOG FILES

Top Posts

More Articles...

Dog Photography
Kenn Bell

Stunning Dog Photography #33

!f you would like a chance to be spotlighted in a future Stunning Dog Photography Column, email photos that are at least 700 pixels wide right here! This is ONLY

Read More »
9
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Why haven't You Signed up For our Newsletter?

Find out why over 8000 Dog lovers have already Joined!

Receive our newsletter, get special deals & stay updated.