Quantcast

You are browsing the archive for 2010 January.

Firefighter Saves Dog From Rushing Floodwater

January 25, 2010 in Heroics, News

If you like The Dog Files please join our Facebook Fan Page at http://www.facebook.com/dogfiles

Also, follow us on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/dogfiles

PawLuxury





Help Animal Victims In Haiti

January 23, 2010 in Charity, News

If you like The Dog Files please join our Facebook Fan Page at http://www.facebook.com/dogfiles

Also, follow us on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/dogfiles

I’m sure at this point we’ve all donated so much to help the people of Haiti. These horrible disasters always have a way of bringing out the best in American’s. It makes me proud to be one.

As is always the case with disasters like this, many animals are also suffering and in need of help and care. Haiti has an estimated 5 million head of livestock, a large stray dog population, native wildlife, and, of course, an untold number of companion animals.

If you’d like to make sure that we don’t forget their plight too, click this link and donate.

Thanks,

Kenn

Bobby Gorgeous, Dog Magician: Video

January 22, 2010 in Fun Videos, News

If you like The Dog Files please join our Facebook Fan Page at http://www.facebook.com/dogfiles

Also, follow us on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/dogfiles

PawLuxury


Dogs Of War

January 22, 2010 in Inhumane Practices, News, World

If you like The Dog Files please join our Facebook Fan Page at http://www.facebook.com/dogfiles

Also, follow us on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/dogfiles

PawLuxury

Dogfighting tournaments in Kabul draw thousands of men and boys as spectators. Photo By Tyler Hicks/The New York Times

 By Thane Burnett, Torontosun.com

On the weekly day of rest in Afghanistan, the dogs are brought out to fight.

Cars and people form a haphazard fighting ring on the outskirts of Kabul most Fridays of these colder months, and against deafening barks and newfound freedom, lowly shopkeepers and fearsome warlords battle on even ground.

Or at least their hard honed beasts do.

As soldiers — including Canadian troops — rise and sometimes fall to protect personal rights like education for young girls and a burgeoning sense of democracy for all, the men of Afghanistan have welcomed back the ancient blood sport of dogfighting.

And over the past few years of its resurgence, there’s been few cries of condemnation from outsiders for a practice the hard-lined Taliban had previously banned as un-Islamic.

“It’s a sensitive issue,” admits Christopher Sainsbury, of Mayhew Animal Home (mayhewanimalhome.org), one of the UK’s busiest animal sanctuaries.

Last year, working as Mayhew International, the agency helped Paul “Penny” Farthing, a former British marine, rescue an Afghanistan dog groomed for fighting. The animal, “Bear”, was later adopted in Britain — one of almost 50 dogs from Afghanistan that have found homes abroad. There are plenty of strays in England, so the highly publicized canine liberation was meant as a way to bring attention to wider concerns.

But Mayhew and other animal rights groups are faced with a reality as tough as the mountain dogs raised to fight. In a country where honour is found in battle, how do you tell a man that — like the oppressors you fight to free him from — you want to deny him a past-time his forefathers enjoyed.

“It’s being rediscovered,” Sainsbury explains of previously outlawed conflict sports, where participants fight using everything from dogs to camels to birds to kites.

Sainsbury says Mayhew keeps tabs on the dogfights held in most major cities in Afghanistan, but isn’t actively trying to have them banned. Instead, they are targeting more widespread practices, including the habit of communities tossing out poisoned meat for stays at dusk — a time when the dogs and feral cats believe they are safest.

Their carcasses are picked up by morning, as the harsh animal control efforts roll on to the next night.

Animal rights activists have also tried to question, not the fights, but the way the dogs are groomed for combat. In some cases — as it was with Bear, who was brought to the U.K. last year — wire or scissors are used to cut tails, and even long ears.

Even beyond fighters, this practice is common among owners.

But the effort of educating a war weary population is slow, especially as locals find welcomed relaxation and a bit of needed profit in wagering over dogfights.

“The people don’t always want to listen,” Sainsbury points out, but believes time, education and access to wider views on humane animal treatment will see the dog brawling decline.

But not any time soon. Perhaps not for another generation, he laments.

Rafal Gerszak, a Canadian photojournalist who covers Afghanistan (rafalgerszak.com), says the matches are taken so seriously, he recalls one owner — as Afghanistan police provided crowd control — losing his $30,000 SUV in a bet.

Gerszak has even felt the sharp bite of the sport, when he nudged too close to one of the dogs while photographing spectators.

And while he doesn’t condone the spectacles, he understands the cultural significance and adds: “The owners really care about (the animals).”

Matches don’t end in death, he notes, but with dominance.

Former British Marine Sergeant Farthing — who returned to Afghanistan last November as a civilian to work on the dog rescue charity he’s started (nowzaddogs.co.uk) — began his campaign while stationed in the hot-zone of Nowzad.

“Looking after the dogs was our moment of escapism,” he recalls in an email exchange with QMI Agency.

A tough soldier who owns one of the Afghanistan strays — not all were involved in fighting — he also sees the benefits of not challenging the Afghan people on the morality of pitting dog against dog.

“The best way to make enemies with another culture is to impose our own so called righteous culture,” he says, noting the numbers of underground dogfights in the UK and North America.

“I have to admit, sad as it is, that I can achieve more for animal welfare in Afghanistan with the tribal leaders on my side than if I focus on banning dog fighting.

“One day, but not yet.”

While it may seem strange that Western views and Taliban laws agree on having the dogfights fade to history, Farthing says diplomacy and education are the only answers.

After all, he points out, when the Taliban banned the sport, the penalty seemed rather inhumane.

The punishment for organizing a dogfight, Farthing points out, was death.


Parts Of Vicious Dog Law Ruled Unconstitutional

January 22, 2010 in Legal News, News

If you like The Dog Files please join our Facebook Fan Page at http://www.facebook.com/dogfiles

Also, follow us on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/dogfiles

PawLuxury

 From ABC Local

TOLEDO, OHIO — What’s it means for the city and dog owners?

A judge has ruled parts of Toledo’s breed specific vicious dog law are unconstitutional. One of the attorneys who argued the case is speaking out about what it means for the city and dog owners.

Hugh Smith has all three of his dogs home with him for the first time in months. They have been the center of a case that could have far reaching effects.

Hugh Smith was walking his dogs in October on a leash when one of them broke free and got into a fight with a neighbor’s dog. Smith’s dogs are cane corso’s. They were labeled as a pit bull type by the dog warden and taken to the pound. He was later charged with 13 criminal counts.

Krisiti Haude is one of Smith’s defense attorneys. She is all for vicious dog laws, but says they should be based on behavior not breed. “I knew we were right. I knew our arguments were legally and factually sound, but there was a little part of me that was a little nervous we wouldn’t win,” says Haude.

Judge Michael Goulding has ruled the ten most serious counts are unconstitutional. “I have cried tears of joy. I have jumped for joy, I have screamed for joy. I am excited about the judge’s opinion which we think is the right one,” says Haude.

City councilman D. Michael Collins says even with the ruling, people are still protected. “Whether it’s a poodle, a mutt, or a pit bull we have the force of law to count on if a dog is deemed vicious,” says Collins.

Smith was able to keep one of the dogs at home while the case is in court. The other two dogs have been boarded at a rescue operation and a vet hospital, but now they are all back together.

The city of Toledo can appeal the ruling. The Ohio Coalition of Dog Advocates has paid the boarding and vet bills for the dogs.


Even Your Chihuahua Can Tweet

January 22, 2010 in Entertainment, Lifestyle News, News, Products

If you like The Dog Files please join our Facebook Fan Page at http://www.facebook.com/dogfiles

Also, follow us on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/dogfiles

PawLuxury

By Parija Kavilanz for CNNMoney.com

src=”http://www.thedogfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/mattel_puppy_tweets.jpg” alt=”" title=”mattel_puppy_tweets” width=”600″ height=”356″ class=”alignleft size-full wp-image-6088″ />

NEW YORK — Social networking is going to the dogs.

In its first-ever toy created for the canine community, Mattel is introducing a product called “Puppy Tweets” that meshes the hugely popular Twitter with consumers’ love of pets.

Puppy Tweets is a plastic tag with a sound and motion sensor that you attach to your pet’s dog collar and connect its USB receiver to your computer. Then you create a Twitter account for your dog and enjoy updates all day from Sparky or whatever its name is on your computer or smartphone.

The tag is set with several pre-recorded tweets that are triggered by the dog’s activities. So if he’s running around, you might get a tweet that says “I finally caught that tail I’ve been chasing and…OOUUUCHH!”

If Sparky is napping, he’ll tweet “Somedays it feels like my paw is permanently on the snooze button!” If he’s making a ruckus, his tweet will let you know that as well, saying”YAHOOOOOOO! Somedays you just gotta get your bark on.”

“Puppy Tweets capitalizes on two popular trends – the use of social media and real time communication, as well as peoples’ extreme love for their dogs,” said Susan Russo, Mattel’s director of marketing.

Puppy Tweets is part of the No. 1 toymaker’s line-up of new products for 2010 that it showcased to members of the media Thursday ahead of the industry’s annual Toy Fair in New York next month.

Jim Silver, a toy industry analyst and editor-in-chief of TimetoPlayMag.com, said he was “curious” about Puppy Tweets when he first saw it.

“I thought that a 5-year-old doesn’t know about Twitter,” he said. But he said that Mattel is going after an entirely different market and “expanding beyond kids” with Puppy Tweets. “This is a product for adults.”

Does it make sense?

Said Silver,”It’s a good thing to try especially since no one else has come up with a pet product quite like this.”

Puppy Tweets will be available at retailers in the fall, and will carry a suggested retail price of $29.99.

Bill Would Require Sterilizing Dangerous Dogs

January 22, 2010 in Legal News, News

If you like The Dog Files please join our Facebook Fan Page at http://www.facebook.com/dogfiles

Also, follow us on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/dogfiles

PawLuxury

 From WBALTV.com

ANNAPOLIS, Md. — The owners of dogs deemed dangerous by local authorities would be required to spay or neuter their animals within 30 days of receiving notice of the canine’s designation, under a bill proposed by a Maryland lawmaker.

Del. Jeannie Haddaway-Riccio, R-Talbot County, told members of the House Judiciary Committee Thursday that her proposal would reduce the number of dogs in shelters and alleviate the aggressiveness of the dog in question.

Local jurisdictions deem a dog dangerous when it has killed or inflicted severe injury on a person without provocation.

Dogs that repeatedly bite people, attack without provocation or kill or severely injure a domestic animal when not on their owner’s property can also be designated “dangerous.”

The bill has the support of the U.S. Humane Society.

“Over 70 percent of dogs involved in biting incidents are male dogs who have not been neutered. Looking back at fatal dog attacks on the whole, about 93 percent come from dogs who have not been sterilized. Within the state of Maryland, every single dog attack since 1965 has involved dogs who are not sterilized,” said Adam Goldfarb, director of the Pets At Risk Humane Society.

Members of the House Judiciary Committee asked for clarification regarding sterilization and were told the animals would be spayed or neutered. Another member wanted to know if there was an exemption for show dogs, but that person was told no — that a dangerous dog is a dangerous dog.

Committee members also learned that this type of regulation is usually handled by a local ordinance rather than a state statute.

“This is very costly to local jurisdictions that have to worry about sheltering or in some cases euthanizing these animals, so it would save local jurisdictions money, as well,” Haddaway-Riccio said.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, children ages 5 to 9 have the highest rate of dog bite injuries.


‘Survival Of The Cutest’ Proves Darwin Right

January 21, 2010 in Health & Science News, News

If you like The Dog Files please join our Facebook Fan Page at http://www.facebook.com/dogfiles

Also, follow us on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/dogfiles

PawLuxury

 From ScienceDaily

Domestic dogs have followed their own evolutionary path, twisting Darwin’s directive ‘survival of the fittest’ to their own needs — and have proved him right in the process, according to a new study by biologists Chris Klingenberg, of The University of Manchester and Abby Drake, of the College of the Holy Cross in the US.

The study, published in The American Naturalist on January 20, 2010, compared the skull shapes of domestic dogs with those of different species across the order Carnivora, to which dogs belong along with cats, bears, weasels, civets and even seals and walruses.

It found that the skull shapes of domestic dogs varied as much as those of the whole order. It also showed that the extremes of diversity were farther apart in domestic dogs than in the rest of the order. This means, for instance, that a Collie has a skull shape that is more different from that of a Pekingese than the skull shape of the cat is from that of a walrus.

To read the rest click here.