Sheriff's Office to Pay Shot Dog's Vet Bill

There seems to be a growing number of dog shootings by police. I don’t have the figures on it, but it is being reported on more frequently.

I’m not sure what to think about it all. I definitely don’t want a policeman to get bitten or mauled by a dog, but I also wonder if some jump the gun (pun intended) a little too fast.

Is there a solution? On the police’s side, a tazer may be the answer. Below the article, I put a video of a dog attacking a police officer. The officer thinks quick and kicks the dog, gaining a few seconds to draw his gun. In this instance, even I might have shot the dog, but the officer shows restraint and the other policeman tazers the dog, sending him running away.

What can I say, seeing this video really brings home what police have to deal with. The answer is never black & white, but it must be made quickly. The response from this team of cops was fantastic! A family pet’s life was spared and the danger of firing a pistol near a group of people was averted.

On the owner’s side? We must remember that when we are around law enforcement, it is crucial to make sure our dogs are secure, and therefore… safe. I always remind myself that my hound’s life is always at risk when a police officer approaches. After all, they are a stranger to my dog and can look like a threat. There should be no issues if we make sure to do our part.

I’d love to hear your comments on the situation, especially if you work in law enforcement.

This article was found at WashingtonPost.com.

Sheriff’s Office to Pay Shot Dog’s Veterinary Bill

By Jenna Johnson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, December 6, 2008

The Charles County sheriff’s office agreed yesterday to pay veterinary expenses for a Waldorf family whose dog was shot this week by an officer in front of two children.

A spokeswoman for the sheriff’s office said an initial investigation found the shooting to be justified. Even so, she said, officials decided to cover the cost of treatment for Dixie, a black-and-white sheepdog, after learning that the family could not.

The shooting occurred as Tammy Shabani stood in the front yard of her home Thursday night, talking with two process servers from the sheriff’s office.

Dixie charged toward the officers, and one opened fire out of fear that the dog would attack, said Diane Richardson, a spokeswoman for the sheriff’s office. She declined to name the officer.

Richardson said the officers arrived at the home about 6 p.m. to serve legal papers to one of Shabani’s relatives. Dixie was running loose in the yard. At the officers’ request, Shabani put the dog in the house.

“They took extra steps to make sure they were outside and away from the dog,” Richardson said. “It’s unfortunate the child opened the door. It’s unfortunate that the dog got out.”
ad_icon

The dog escaped when Shabani’s 2-year-old granddaughter, watching from inside with Shabani’s 12-year-old son, pushed open a screen door.

After the shooting, the family found Dixie — wounded but alive — in the woods near their home, in a rural area on St. Peter’s Church Road. Larry Grenier, Shabani’s brother-in-law, said veterinarians at a nearby animal hospital wrapped Dixie with a bandage and sedated her but told the family they would need at least $1,600 up front to operate on the dog.

The family decided to have Dixie put down instead, Grenier said.

“My sister-in-law has three kids, health problems. She’s on welfare. She can’t afford that,” he said.

But late Thursday, Shabani received a call saying Dixie was still alive and not as severely injured as was originally thought, he said.

Grenier described Dixie as friendly and said the officer overreacted. “It was a pretty terrible thing to do in front of two kids,” he said.

The property manager of Shabani’s house described Dixie as aggressive. In October, she said, the dog chased her back to her car when she stopped by the house to collect rent money.

“It was barking and showing its teeth, so I just ran back to my car as fast as I could,” she said, speaking on condition of anonymity because she was concerned about retaliation. “I’m not into anybody shooting dogs, but I don’t know what I would have done” in the officers’ situation.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
coreywillis
15 years ago

I completely agree. We don't want the lives of Police to be put in danger, but we also don't necessarily need to kill the dog. Alternatives to shooting the animal seem like a plausible solution. As you said, it would also help avoid shooting around other people who could be in the area.

Kenn Bell
15 years ago

Thanks for commenting, Corey!

tg
tg
15 years ago

offering to pay the bill for the dog with a 2,500 limit and signing papers saying they wont sue is not any great pat on the back also considering the bill is way over that now and the vet wouldnt do any thing with out cash up front so the county and the dangerous actions of the officer should be ashamed to say the least

Katybeth Jensen
15 years ago

It sounds like both the dog and police officer overreacted. Shooting at the dog was perhaps overkill (no pun intended) However, if we are to blame the deed and not the breed than we have to be clear that the responsibility to keep the dog from harming or behaving in a threatening manner towards the officers was the owners responsibility.
All dogs can act out under stress or when they feel threatened, it is up to the owner to keep their dog safe from these types of situations. While the vet was lacking in empathy, the police department certainly seemed to act fairly and take responsibility for overreacting. I hope the children involved, were not blamed but perhaps consoled, and a discussion about responsible dog ownership was forthcoming, especially for the benefit of the 12 year old. In fact, It seems everyone involved could learn a little more about how to react in the case of an aggressive dog.

tg
tg
15 years ago

offering to pay the bill for the dog with a 2,500 limit and signing papers saying they wont sue is not any great pat on the back also considering the bill is way over that now and the vet wouldnt do any thing with out cash up front so the county and the dangerous actions of the officer should be ashamed to say the least

Katybeth Jensen
15 years ago

It sounds like both the dog and police officer overreacted. Shooting at the dog was perhaps overkill (no pun intended) However, if we are to blame the deed and not the breed than we have to be clear that the responsibility to keep the dog from harming or behaving in a threatening manner towards the officers was the owners responsibility.
All dogs can act out under stress or when they feel threatened, it is up to the owner to keep their dog safe from these types of situations. While the vet was lacking in empathy, the police department certainly seemed to act fairly and take responsibility for overreacting. I hope the children involved, were not blamed but perhaps consoled, and a discussion about responsible dog ownership was forthcoming, especially for the benefit of the 12 year old. In fact, It seems everyone involved could learn a little more about how to react in the case of an aggressive dog.

SUBSCRIBE TO
DOG FILES

Top Posts

More Articles...

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Why haven't You Signed up For our Newsletter?

Find out why over 8000 Dog lovers have already Joined!

Receive our newsletter, get special deals & stay updated.